McCrory's Myths: North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory's favorite talking points about HB2—and why they're wrong

Myth: 29 states have laws similar to North Carolina’s.

No other state has a law like HB 2—it’s completely unprecedented. Letting transgender people use the right restroom is required in every state under federal law, and only North Carolina has actively flouted the law by restricting transgender people’s restroom access. While 18 states and DC have laws that affirm the rights that transgender people already have under federal law, the 29 remaining states simply haven’t passed any legislation about this, meaning that they’re letting federal law stand.

Myth: Five days isn’t enough time for Governor McCrory to disavow HB 2.

Gov. McCrory signed this law late at night after it was rushed through the legislature in a matter of hours. Meanwhile, the federal government, North Carolinians, and advocates around the country have spent weeks exposing HB 2’s harms. The claim that Gov. McCrory hasn’t had enough time to understand why passing HB 2 was a mistake is absurd.

Myth: The Department of Justice’s letter is “baseless and blatant overreach.”

The Department of Justice is simply enforcing well-established federal nondiscrimination law. The real government overreach was HB 2 itself. When Charlotte’s elected government did exactly what it told voters it was going to do and passed a straightforward nondiscrimination ordinance, the North Carolina government swooped in to overturn it—and what’s more, it stripped local governments of their power to pass any more nondiscrimination ordinances, protect their constituents from harmful workplace conditions, or even take nondiscrimination principles into account when doing business with private contractors.

Myth: Restroom access was never an issue until Charlotte’s ordinance was passed.

Transgender people have been using the restroom that matches their gender for years all around the country, including in North Carolina. That hasn’t harmed anyone—including in the more than 250 cities with ordinances like the one that Charlotte passed. In fact, the opposite is true: transgender people’s everyday restroom use was never an issue until Gov. McCrory made it one.

Myth: This is a matter of safety and privacy for people who aren’t transgender.

The real experts on preventing sexual violence—over 300 anti-sexual assault and anti-domestic violence groups—have flatly rejected the claim that excluding transgender people from restroom that match their gender somehow protects other people’s privacy or safety. “Those who perpetuate falsehoods about transgender people and nondiscrimination laws are putting transgender people in harm’s way and making no one safer,” they said. “We cannot stand by while the needs of survivors, both those who are transgender and those who are not, are obscured in order to push a political agenda that does nothing to serve and protect victims and potential victims.”

Myth: Most people support the restroom restrictions placed on transgender people by HB 2.

Americans oppose discriminatory requirements like those established by HB 2 by a wide margin, according to a new CNN poll. And almost half of North Carolinians are opposed to HB 2 and believe that it has not made the state any safer, and most believe that it’s having a negative impact on North Carolina’s economy. Governor McCrory’s claim that HB 2 is in line with what North Carolinians want is simply false.

Myth: Transgender people are not protected under federal nondiscrimination law.

The vast majority of federal courts that have ruled on this issue, as well as the Attorney General and agencies across the federal government, have been saying for years that federal laws prohibiting sex discrimination make it illegal to discriminate against transgender people. That’s nothing new. Federal courts have recognized that sex discrimination necessarily includes discrimination based on gender identity and transgender status, and that claiming otherwise doesn’t make any sense. In fact, the federal appeals court whose jurisdiction includes North Carolina recently agreed that federal law protects transgender people’s right to use the restroom matching their gender. Gov. McCrory’s lawsuit relies on a handful of outdated cases whose attempts to cut transgender people out of nondiscrimination laws have been rejected by the majority of federal courts.

Here are just a few of the cases recognizing that transgender people are protected under federal law:

• G.G. v. Gloucester County School Board (Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, 2016)
• Fabian v. Hospital of Central Connecticut (Connecticut Federal District Court, 2016)
• Rumble v. Fairview Health Service (Minnesota Federal District Court, 2015)
• Finkle v. Howard County (Maryland Federal District Court, 2014)
• Glenn v. Brumby (Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, 2011)
• Schroer v. Billington (District of Columbia Federal District Court, 2008)
• Mitchell v. Axcan Scandiphar (Pennsylvania Federal District Court, 2006)
• Barnes v. Cincinnati (Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, 2005)
• Smith v. City of Salem (Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, 2004)
• Rosa v. Park West Bank & Trust Company (First Circuit Court of Appeals, 2000)
• Schwenk v. Hartford (Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, 1999)